The Desi Bites Foods case study
Every post in the Jargon, Decoded series that needs a worked example uses the same fictional company, so the numbers stay familiar as you move from one concept to the next. This page is the reference — individual posts link back here instead of re-explaining the business or re-pasting the statements.
Desi Bites Foods Pvt Ltd is not a real company — it’s a fictional packaged namkeen & snacks manufacturer, built as a fully reconciled three-statement model (the balance sheet balances every year; the cash flow statement ties exactly to the balance sheet’s cash figure) so the arithmetic behind every ratio actually works out the way it would for a real business. Nothing on this page is investment advice — see the privacy & disclaimer policy.
The business
Desi Bites makes packaged namkeen and snacks, sold under its own brand to distributors across a few states. One manufacturing unit, one product line, nothing exotic — no subsidiaries, no foreign currency, no complex segments. It sells to distributors on roughly 30 days’ credit and buys raw material (edible oil, flour, spices, packaging) on roughly 40 days’ credit. A term loan funded a plant expansion, drawn further in FY24 and being paid down since. All figures below are in ₹ Lakh, for the year ended 31 March.
Income Statement
| FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 1800 | 2160 | 2592 |
| COGS | 1152 | 1361 | 1607 |
| Gross Profit | 648 | 799 | 985 |
| Operating expenses | 396 | 464 | 544 |
| EBITDA | 252 | 335 | 441 |
| Depreciation | 90 | 100 | 115 |
| EBIT | 162 | 235 | 326 |
| Interest | 45 | 48 | 47 |
| PBT | 117 | 187 | 279 |
| Tax | 29 | 47 | 70 |
| PAT (Net Profit) | 88 | 140 | 209 |
| Dividend paid | 26 | 49 | 84 |
Balance Sheet
| FY22 (opening) | FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Net fixed assets | 630 | 640 | 690 | 655 |
| Inventory | 140 | 158 | 186 | 211 |
| Trade receivables | 135 | 148 | 178 | 199 |
| Cash & bank | 60 | 111 | 178 | 280 |
| Total Assets | 965 | 1057 | 1232 | 1345 |
| Equity (capital + reserves) | 400 | 462 | 553 | 678 |
| Term loan | 400 | 410 | 460 | 400 |
| Trade payables | 115 | 126 | 149 | 185 |
| Other current liabilities* | 50 | 59 | 70 | 82 |
| Total Liabilities + Equity | 965 | 1057 | 1232 | 1345 |
* tax payable and accrued expenses, bundled into one line for simplicity — a real filing splits these out further, and splits the term loan into its current and non-current portions. Equity Share Capital is a constant ₹100L the whole way through (10 lakh shares of ₹10 face value), set up now so per-share numbers have clean figures to work with once the valuation posts introduce a hypothetical listing.
Cash Flow Statement
| FY23 | FY24 | FY25 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cash from Operations | 167 | 216 | 326 |
| Cash from Investing | -100 | -150 | -80 |
| Cash from Financing | -16 | 1 | -144 |
| Net change in cash | 51 | 67 | 102 |
| Closing cash | 111 | 178 | 280 |
Built with a simplified indirect method — starting from PAT and adjusting for depreciation and working-capital movements — rather than a full Ind-AS presentation. Good enough to show how the three statements connect, which is the point of a case study like this.
A note on the numbers
These statements were built as a single reconciled model, not typed in separately — the balance sheet balances to zero in every year (including the FY22 opening position) and cash flow ties exactly to the balance sheet’s cash figure. If a post ever shows a ratio that doesn’t match what you calculate from these tables, that’s a bug — let us know.